Seattle’s Oil Pipelines

A few months ago,  everyone in government and politics came to cut the ribbon on the new oil pipeline. Even the governor running for president came. But he didn’t mention carbon pollution or climate change. No one did in the endless speeches faithfully relayed to twitter where I tried not to read but could not turn away. We even had tours of the new facility!

Why were they so overjoyed about a late, over-budget, expensive oil pipeline?!?!

Continue reading “Seattle’s Oil Pipelines”

Primary Elections in Seattle & King County, 2021!

If you’re in Seattle or King County you might have noticed there’s an election! You hopefully already have your ballot as they were mailed out last Wednesday (if not, King County Elections can fix that). Here are my not very detailed preferences on various races. Note this isn’t all the elections on the ballot just the ones I’m voting on or care a bit about that I know anything about. This is not going to be long on explanation (well hopefully not) but a better place to dump my recommendations than a twitter thread. If you want longer discussions of candidates or other endorsement lists, my favorite sources are The Urbanist, the Transit Riders Union, 350 Seattle, or Publicola and even The Stranger is kind of okay.

Not Seattle

I’ve mostly not been paying all that much attention (for me not very much) to electoral politics generally and even less so for non-Seattle races. That said, I’m getting the impression talking to friends who are paying more attention that there are a lot of incumbents being challenged by folks with really great backgrounds and experience who we haven’t seen in many similar roles so if I don’t mention something on your ballot, have a look at those endorsements links! You might find someone pretty awesome you weren’t expecting.

King County Council

One place where I think we could use some great incumbent challengers is King County Council. I have a great council person, Girmay Zahilay, in D2, but a number of the positions have been long filled by fairly timid (at my most charitable) members who don’t seem to want to really address problems. Fortunately we have some great challengers! In district 9 (parts of the east side and going to the southeast of the county), a fairly conservative incumbent has two really great challengers including Kim-Khanh Van who has a particular focus on how important housing and land use are to addressing climate change regionally and has strong ties in communities that often do not get much of a seat at the table in our region. Ubax Gardheere similarly comes from a background that are often gets name-checked as important, but not often given the stage, and has been working on equitable development in Seattle city government. While I can’t vote for either, they both definitely are the kind of people I was thinking of when I wrote “Stop Voting for White Men“: they are close enough to where I am on policy while coming with the background and experience that means they have worked twice as hard to get where they are and know how deeply important their work is and mean the ‘bench’ of people who will be running for higher offices will be larger and truly more diverse. The various endorsement links have recommendations on other county council positions but D9 is the one I’ve paid any attention to, so that’s all you get here. 🙂

King County Executive

I’ve been for Joe Ngyuen since he announced. I met him briefly at an event at Seattle U when he was running for state senator and liked him then. He won that seat with work: organizing and getting folks new to politics out for him, despite the establishment having already anointed a candidate for the open seat. On paper, a lot of our “progressive candidates” don’t seem very different, so one way I am using to think about my choices is: do they see the urgency? The incumbent has been in office for almost twelve years and we built a youth jail, still have massive amounts of criminalization county wide, a floundering “regional homelessness” organization, lots of sprawl and not enough investment in policy that will let people actually live in the region stably without increasing harm to the environment. Nguyen is running with a sense of urgency, so I’m voting for him.

Port of Seattle Commissioners

Technically this one isn’t on the primary ballot, but I am so glad we have good candidates for Port that I had to mention them! The Port of Seattle is fairly overlooked. It controls vast amounts of land, multiple shipping port facilities, the airport (obviously!) and has influence on so many things. In the past, the Port has been anywhere from corrupt to incompetent. The Port commission has often been filled mostly with folks who care primarily about whatever large businesses want, not what is really good for workers or the environment (or, to the degree they care, if it conflicts with what business wants, it’s usually the workers and the environment that get less). At the general, we have the chance to unseat two incumbents, both of which I’ve disliked and have voted against in the past due to being far too large business focused and not enough concerned about climate change. You can vote them out by voting for Hamdi Mohamed and Toshiko Hasegawa … soon. 🙂

County Ballot Measure: Best Start for Kids

You like kids and want them to do well in life? Then vote for this. Note that because our tax system is so messed up, this is really a renewal of an existing property tax levy that funds already highly successful programs.

Seattle

School Board

You’ll have to read the endorsements linked above for ideas on school board. I just have very little opinions on school board. I am increasingly of the opinion that the way the school board and the district are structured makes it near impossible for them to effectively oversee the district and I just don’t have opinions right now on who would be better for each position. Sorry. 😦

Seattle City Attorney

Seattle is weird (for Washington cities) in that it elects a city attorney. Their office gives legal advice to the city, manages cases where the city is being sued or sues other entities on the city’s behalf, and decides on how to handle misdemeanor offenses (criminal violations are handled by the county). The incumbent has been … okay. But his priorities are not inline with where I am politically as far as what is justice: justice is not criminalizing poverty by putting people who commit minor offenses through the harms of the legal system (including up to a year in jail!). Justice is going after abusive landlords and employers and other larger interests that cause harm that the city has to make up for in other ways. The incumbent has done some of this but he also does absurd things like pushing to get Seattle out from under the consent decree the city has been under arguing SPD had improved enough to not need it (which lolwhut).

Fortunately, Nicole Thomas-Kennedy is challenging the incumbent with exactly the kind of platform I’d want. Vote NTK.

Seattle City Council, Position 8

Teresa Mosqueda is running for re-election. She is my favorite (sorry all my other favorites). She has gotten so much done. She didn’t let the head tax repeal stop her and got JumpStart passed which to be honest I think most others would have given up. There may as well only be Mosqueda on the position 8 ballot!

Seattle City Council, Position 9

Lorena González chose not to run again for position 9 in order to run for mayor, leaving us with an open seat. While I’d be happy with either Nikkita Oliver or Brianna Thomas, I’m voting for Oliver (I gave each one of my vouchers months ago). While you can read any number of longer endorsements that talk about what Oliver is about and why you should vote for them, I think the most important for me is that they have publicly evolved on a number of policies that matter to me in a way that I think is representative of how people should consider issues and learn, while still keeping their focus on building a real community for all that has been their focus for a long time. Vote for Oliver, but if not her, vote for Thomas. 🙂

Seattle Mayor

I know you were just skimming down for this one. We are quite blessed with choice. Unlike the year of too many mayors where I thought a number of seemingly credible candidates were superfluous or really did not understand why they were running, the candidates I consider worth voting for I understand why they all ran (and even the ones I don’t want to vote for, I at least understand mostly). This race more than the others really makes me wish we had some form of ranked choice voting because then I would not be stuck with the problem where I’d be happy with three folks for sure but figuring out which one to vote for who has the “best” chance of advancing or of beating a likely more conservative candidate in the general is a fool’s game. Anyway let’s pretend I had ranked choice voting. If we did I would probably rank like this:

  1. Andrew Grant Houston
  2. Lorena González
  3. Colleen Echohawk

I would just not rank anyone else (note I gave Houston and González both one democracy voucher a while ago and hadn’t really looked at Echohawk at that point). Some might be surprised to see Jessyn Farrell not on this list, but she has publicly (and, in my opinion, incoherently) supported the so-called “Compassion Seattle” charter amendment which is some anti-homeless bullshit (this is a technical term, see House Our Neighbors for more) and even sent a mailer to our house promoting her support for it, so whether she means to or not, she is aligned with people who are more interested in not ever having to see people without homes than they are in helping them find homes.

So that leaves me with three who all have good to great positions and backgrounds and all that stuff. In keeping with the philosophy behind “Stop Voting for White Men” which is more around around voting for people close to me in policy who are underrepresented in government, then Houston is probably one of the less represented, at least in part because he is an actual renter in a city where the majority of people rent and are increasingly being driven out of Seattle to find cheaper rents. Almost no elected city officials are renters (I think none since González and Mosqueda have bought homes) and I wonder how far back we’d have to go to find a mayor that didn’t own (I would love to be proved wrong that there have been many recent mayors that didn’t own a home!)

Of course, we don’t have ranked choice voting so ultimately I have to fill out my ballot for just one. I have to decide to just vote my reasoned #1 or question which one I think will be “best” in the general. I hate that a lot. Can we just have ranked choice voting? But likely I’ll just vote my #1 because ultimately I think one of these three will advance to the general and the political hacks and wonks will count the votes for the other two as being part of their support base (which I hope turns out to be true!)

Anyway we really need ranked choice voting which the county council might put on a ballot … next year. Cannot come soon enough.

An arbitrary milestone on piano

A little over nineteen (19) weeks ago, a friend living across the street was moving and he couldn’t take his old upright piano to his new place. He’d gotten it free from a friend and so I got it free, aside from splitting the cost of piano movers (needed even just for across the street) and a piano tuning, as it hadn’t been in a while.

So we got a piano in our living room.

A dark brown upright piano from Franklin Piano Co sits with the keys showing. On the leaned out music stand is a piano method open to a version of Amazing Grace. Classics to Moderns and the Rocky Horror Show song book are closed to the right with a notebook. On top of the piano is a record player, a lamp, some other books and various pieces of art which are too long to describe here (email me!)
A piano. In our living room!
Continue reading “An arbitrary milestone on piano”

Writing the Mayor on Defund SPD again

I don’t have a lot of time or energy to write blog posts and I save it for dashing out emails to my elected officials. This morning the mayor of Seattle gave a press conference on what she plans to do in response to the Defund SPD (Seattle police department) movement demand which a super majority of the city council has voiced public support. At this press conference, she made a number of disingenuous claims but I was primarily incensed by the idea that there is “no plan” and the “activists” don’t want anyone responding to 911 calls.

Continue reading “Writing the Mayor on Defund SPD again”

Dear Mayor Durkan: Defund the police

Since our mayor, Jenny Durkan, marched with Black Lives Matter yesterday here in Seattle, but still shows no sign of meeting the organizers demands, I wrote her again.


Dear Mayor Durkan,

Yesterday you marched with Black Lives Matter through my neighborhood, silently, in support of them. However you have not committed to what they are asking for. Instead, you offer that you’ll find around $100 million to go to community support – housing, jobs, mental health – for black and indigenous and other communities of color. But you aren’t committing to removing the use of police and defunding them and that will undermine the good from any new investment (assuming you can even find that much money during a budget crisis).

Even if you waved a magic wand tomorrow and all police officers became scrupulously unbiased, always obeyed the laws themselves and never lied or misled, we would still be harming black and indigenous and other non-white people disproportionately. That is because we use the police – armed officers – for problems they are not suited for. As a specific example, people in the Seattle area that are homeless or unstably housed are disproportionately black and indigenous. Many police calls are related to the discomfort of the housed in seeing homeless people near them. The city even intentionally uses police during official removals of homeless encampments. Each one of those calls is a chance of force being used which will by necessity fall more on black and indigenous people because they are a greater share of the population being policed this way. Even if the police do not use force, the best case for most of these calls is to make a person move a long after fearing that worse could happen to them. Often we arrest people without homes for minor “crimes” against property like entering empty buildings or littering or doing drugs the housed do quietly in the privacy of their homes. Again, this will disproportionately harm black and indigenous people here in Seattle, no matter how professional and well-trained the police are.

Armed police are the wrong way to handle social problems related to homelessness. They are the wrong way to handle nearly all problems they are asked to handle. Every time we send an armed cop trained to use violence into a situation – and the vast majority of the time there is no active violent crime in progress – there is a non-zero chance of death or brutalization. In the best case scenarios, people are made to feel unwelcome in their own city and typically will not have any of their needs met, be it housing, drug counseling, food, mental or physical health, etc.

We spend over $400 million a year on policing and $100 million spent in other ways will not offset the harm the police do by their very presence. The only way to remove the harm of sending armed people trained to arrest people is to not have armed people trained to arrest people.

Marching with Black Lives Matter means very little if you are unwilling to truly consider their demands which start with “Defund the police”.